Spartan women have been a subject of historical debate for centuries, with historians often holding conflicting views based on scant and sometimes contradictory sources. This article examines two perspectives on Spartan women by focusing on the works of Sarah Pomeroy and Paul Cartledge. While Pomeroy provides a more detailed understanding of the roles and lives of Spartan women, Cartledge offers a broader view of Spartan society, often questioning the reliability of ancient sources. By exploring their methodologies and conclusions, we can better understand how each historian contributes to our knowledge of Spartan women. This comparative analysis will highlight the complexities and challenges of studying ancient history, mainly when sources are limited and potentially biased.